Foundation of a Weaponized Term

Neat article from: http://memoryholeblog.com/2013/01/20/cia-document-1035-960-foundation-of-a-weaponized-term/#more-2077

“Conspiracy theory” is a term that at once strikes fear and anxiety in the hearts of most every public figure, particularly journalists and academics. Since the 1960s the label has become a disciplinary device that has been overwhelmingly effective in defining certain events off limits to inquiry or debate. Especially in the United States raising legitimate questions about dubious official narratives destined to inform public opinion (and thereby public policy) is a major thought crime that must be cauterized from the public psyche at all costs.


Conspiracy theory’s acutely negative connotations may be traced to liberal historian Richard Hofstadter’s well-known fusillades against the “New Right.” Yet it was the Central Intelligence Agency that likely played the greatest role in effectively “weaponizing” the term. In the groundswell of public skepticism toward the Warren Commission’s findings on the assassination of President John F. Kennedy, the CIA sent a detailed directive to all of its bureaus. Titled “Countering Criticism of the Warren Commission Report,” the dispatch played a definitive role in making the “conspiracy theory” term a weapon to be wielded against almost any individual or group calling the government’s increasingly clandestine programs and activities into question.
This important memorandum and its broad implications for American politics and public discourse are detailed in a forthcoming book by Florida State University political scientist Lance deHaven-Smith, Conspiracy Theory in America. Dr. deHaven-Smith devised the state crimes against democracy concept to interpret and explain potential government complicity in events such as the Gulf of Tonkin incident, the major political assassinations of the 1960s, and 9/11.

CIA Document 1035-960 was released in response to a 1976 FOIA request by the New York Times. The directive is especially significant because it outlines the CIA’s concern regarding “the whole reputation of the American government” vis-à-vis the Warren Commission Report. The agency was especially interested in maintaining its own image and role as it “contributed information to the [Warren] investigation.”

The memorandum lays out a detailed series of actions and techniques for “countering and discrediting the claims of the conspiracy theorists, so as to inhibit the circulation of such claims in other countries.” For example, approaching “friendly elite contacts (especially politicians and editors)” to remind them of the Warren Commission’s integrity and soundness should be prioritized. “[T]he charges of the critics are without serious foundation,” the document reads, and “further speculative discussion only plays in to the hands of the [Communist] opposition.”

The agency also directed its members “[t]o employ propaganda assets to [negate] and refute the attacks of the critics. Book reviews and feature articles are particularly appropriate for this purpose.”

1035-960 further delineates specific techniques for countering “conspiratorial” arguments centering on the Warren Commission’s findings. Such responses and their coupling with the pejorative label have been routinely wheeled out in various guises by corporate media outlets, commentators and political leaders to this day against those demanding truth and accountability about momentous public events.

*No significant new evidence has emerged which the [Warren] Commission did not consider.

*Critics usually overvalue particular items and ignore others.

*Conspiracy on the large scale often suggested would be impossible to conceal in the United States.

*Critics have often been enticed by a form of intellectual pride: they light on some theory and fall in love with it.

*Oswald would not have been any sensible person’s choice for a co-conspirator.

*Such vague accusations as that “more than ten people have died mysteriously” [during the Warren Commission’s inquiry] can always be explained in some natural way e.g.: the individuals concerned have for the most part died of natural causes.

Today more so than ever news media personalities and commentators occupy powerful positions for initiating propaganda activities closely resembling those set out in 1035-960 against anyone who might question state-sanctioned narratives of controversial and poorly understood occurrences. Indeed, as the motives and methods encompassed in the document have become fully internalized by intellectual workers and operationalized through such media, the almost uniform public acceptance of official accounts concerning unresolved events such as the Oklahoma City Murrah Federal Building bombing, 9/11, and most recently the Sandy Hook Elementary School massacre, is largely guaranteed.

The effect on academic and journalistic inquiry into ambiguous and unexplained events that may in turn mobilize public inquiry, debate and action has been dramatic and far-reaching. One need only look to the rising police state and evisceration of civil liberties and constitutional protections as evidence of how this set of subtle and deceptive intimidation tactics has profoundly encumbered the potential for future independent self-determination and civic empowerment.

Links To Disturbing Stuff

This is just a little collection of links to stories that I think people should be paying attention to.

The coming dark times:

Us Army Internment and Resettlement Manual:

http://info.publicintelligence.net/USArmy-InternmentResettlement.pdf

Business Insider article: DHS ordering 450 million rounds of hollow point ammo

http://www.businessinsider.com/us-immigration-agents-are-loading-up-on-as-many-as-450-million-new-rounds-of-ammo-2012-3

Business Insider: DHS still stockpiling new bullets

http://www.businessinsider.com/dhs-fletc-ammunition-purchases-750-million-200-million-40-caliber-rounds-2013-1

Actual government procurement order for hollow point ammunition:

https://www.fbo.gov/index?s=opportunity&mode=form&tab=core&id=7b5c06fb36a4ab38763d05c4ebeac203&_cview=0

Fox News: we're now one step closer to America's coming civil war:

http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2013/01/03/were-now-one-step-closer-to-america-coming-civil-war/?intcmp=trending

ABC News: court oks barring high IQs for cops:

http://abcnews.go.com/US/court-oks-barring-high-iqs-cops/story?id=95836#.UMuV

Released FBI documents reveal plan to assassinate OWS protestors:

http://banoosh.com/2012/12/23/released-fbi-documents-reveal-plans-to-assassinate-ows-activists/

https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/549518-fbi-ows-documents.html

A West Point think tank has issued a paper warning America about “far right” groups such as the “anti-federalist” movement, which supports “civil activism, individual freedoms and self-government.”

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2013/jan/17/west-point-center-cites-dangers-far-right-us/

CIA admits using media to manipulate Americans:

House committee hearings 1975:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=5ED63A_hcd0

CNN caught faking news stories, 1992

https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=jTWY14eyMFg

Pentagon wants to crank up the propaganda, 2002

http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2002/feb/19/marketingandpr.september112001
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/1830500.stm

Staged CNN interviews with Activist Danny in Syria

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3lWB5ssifTg

Paedophile satanists in high places:

Conspiracy of silence: The Franklin cover-up:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=D3IsCPOADc4

Nearly everyone in UK Paedophile ring is a Freemason, says abuse victim:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6m-5BUNXfNU&feature=share

Jimmy Saville, friend to the Royals, BBC legend, satanist, child molester:

www.todayonline.com/World/EDC130111-0000144/Prolific-sex-abuser-Saville-groomed-a-nation--UK-police

http://www.express.co.uk/posts/view/370439/Jimmy-Savile-was-part-of-satanic-ring

Retired FBI agent Ted Gunderson tells all:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OGQO8ci4R2Y

British royalty not just ceremonial after all:

Hrm. So, what now?

http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2013/jan/14/secret-papers-royals-veto-bills

9/11 again:

Popular mechanics debunked with ease:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dvFuRYyEkiU

Best 5 minute 9/11 video ever:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yu00AGWQl1g&feature=player_embedded#!

Financial Hijinx

Oldest Swiss Bank closing:

http://ca.reuters.com/article/businessNews/idCABRE9020O020130104

9 trillion bucks missing from Federal Reserve:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1QK4bblyfsc&feature=youtu.be

Vatican is on 'cash only' for the time being:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/01/03/its-cash-only-vatican-money-laundering_n_2403006.html

69 trillion dollar order wreaks havoc on Stockholm stock exchange:

http://www.businessinsider.com/stockholm-stock-exchange-shutdown-28-2012-11

HSBC above the law:

http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/blogs/taibblog/outrageous-hsbc-settlement-proves-the-drug-war-is-a-joke-20121213

US Army testing chemicals on populace of St. Louis, declassified documents show:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kvNdcsDlgIE&feature=youtu.be

Chinese takeover of Canada:

CSIS: China controls Canadian politicians

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=43fk6BCr7hM

Yes, I belong to a secret society:

John Kerry on Skull and Bones:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TlQsHC9WzO8&feature=player_embedded

What the actual fuck?

NSA declassified document about decoding extraterrestrial messages:

https://www.nsa.gov/public_info/_files/ufo/key_to_et_messages.pdf

Is somebody fucking with us?

http://www.reuters.com/article/2010/09/15/idUS166901+15-Sep-2010+PRN20100915

CSIS: China Controls Canadian Politicians

Drafting a letter to the local paper about this thing here:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=43fk6BCr7hM#!

Several months ago, Richard Fadden, director of CSIS, spoke to CBC news and candidly discussed his concerns that several provincial and municipal politicians were under the influence of foreign governments, most notably China, and that said governments were playing a long game of expanding their influence here by recruiting candidates through the universities at social clubs.

That the director of CSIS is taking this extraordinary step speaks to the perceived direness of the situation.

I cannot help but be reminded of the time John F Kennedy addressed the press and warned them of their duty in helping to combat the creep of outside influences, making a few cryptic comments about Marxism and secret societies before alleging "we are opposed around the world by a monolithic and ruthless conspiracy that relies on covert means for expanding its sphere of influence--on infiltration instead of invasion, on subversion instead of elections, on intimidation instead of free choice, on guerrillas by night instead of armies by day. It is a system which has conscripted vast human and material resources into the building of a tightly knit, highly efficient machine that combines military, diplomatic, intelligence, economic, scientific and political operations. Its preparations are concealed, not published. Its mistakes are buried not headlined. Its dissenters are silenced, not praised. No expenditure is questioned, no rumor is printed, no secret is revealed."






I am aware that as the world's situation grows more complex, dire threats are being perceived in all quarters.  Further, I cannot pretend to see the big picture or to understand all the forces at work. I know that warnings of a takeover of our government by foreign infiltrators given by the director of CSIS should be heeded. I know that our press institutions understand that it is their dedication to keeping the people informed and up-to-date about the matter may be the only slim hope for our nation to survive this. I am confident that these organizations are developing a long-term strategy that will see them do their utmost to keep the public aware of the nature of the problem.

I have great faith that although foreign governments may be subverting our elected officials, they could and would never subvert our free press, whose men and women must also live and raise families here. I know we can trust them with our nation's future.

I likewise have great faith that the men and women serving as MPs on Parliament Hill, who are clearly above reproach, will understand the immediacy and direness of this threat to our civilization and will be making every attempt to push the topic to the top of their political agenda.






Regards,

xxx



******************




Alright, at this link here http://www.canlaw.com/media/emailed.htm

...we have a list of email addresses for national media outlets in Canada.

jgadd@globeandmail.ca 
letters@macleans.ca 
marnoon@halifax.cbc.ca 
mediatv@mail.north.net 
mirror@fc.babylon.montreal.qc.ca 
national@toronto.cbc.ca 
NEWSDAY@ottawa.cbc.ca 
news_ed@canoe.ca 
politics@toronto.cbc.ca 
radio@edmonton.cbc.ca 
sunletters@ppress.wimsey.com 
tabtips@ppress.wimsey.com 
city_desk@freepress.mb.ca 
wreport@toronto.cbc.ca 
almanac@mindlink.bc.ca 
cairn@musicm.mcgill.ca 
fifth@toronto.cbc.ca 
info@lifenet.ca 
kixx@foxnet.net 
mainstreet@halifax.cbc.ca 
marc@web.apc.org 
news@ctv.ca 
newsroom@globeandmail.ca 
promo@chez106.com 
pulse@citytv.com 
radionet@edmonton.src.ca 
radionews@toronto.cbc.ca 
sjinfoam@saintjohn.cbc.ca 
talk640@wic.ca 
timesc@interlink.bc.ca 
tips@utvnews.com 

And at this link here, a list of email addresses of Canadian MPs: http://butterflystorms.blog.ca/2011/07/05/canadian-mps-email-addresses-web-pages-11431378/

NDP


malcolm.allen@parl.gc.ca,charlie.angus@parl.gc.ca,niki.ashton@parl.gc.ca,alex.atamanenko@parl.gc.ca,Robert.Aubin@parl.gc.ca,
Paulina.Ayala@parl.gc.ca,Tyrone.Benskin@parl.gc.ca,dennis.bevington@parl.gc.ca,Denis.Blanchette@parl.gc.ca,Lysane.Blanchette-Lamothe@parl.gc.ca,Francoise.Boivin@parl.gc.ca,Charmaine.Borg@parl.gc.ca,Alexandre.Boulerice@parl.gc.ca,Marjolaine.Boutin-Sweet@parl.gc.ca, Tarik.Brahmi@parl.gc.ca,RuthEllen.Brosseau@parl.gc.ca,Guy.Caron@parl.gc.ca,Andrew.Cash@parl.gc.ca,chris.charlton@parl.gc.ca,
Sylvain.Chicoine@parl.gc.ca,Robert.Chisholm@parl.gc.ca,Francois.Choquette@parl.gc.ca,olivia.chow@parl.gc.ca,
david.christopherson@parl.gc.ca,Ryan.Cleary@parl.gc.ca,joe.comartin@parl.gc.ca,Raymond.Cote@parl.gc.ca,
jean.crowder@parl.gc.ca,nathan.cullen@parl.gc.ca,don.davies@parl.gc.ca,libby.davies@parl.gc.ca,Anne-Marie.Day@parl.gc.ca,
paul.dewar@parl.gc.ca,Pierre.DionneLabelle@parl.gc.ca,fin.donnelly@parl.gc.ca,Rosane.DoreLefebvre@parl.gc.ca,
Matthew.Dube@parl.gc.ca,linda.duncan@parl.gc.ca,Pierre-Luc.Dusseault@parl.gc.ca,Mylene.Freeman@parl.gc.ca,Randall.Garrison@parl.gc.ca,Rejean.Genest@parl.gc.ca,Jonathan.Genest-Jourdain@parl.gc.ca,Alain.Giguere@parl.gc.ca,yvon.godin@parl.gc.ca,claude.gravelle@parl.gc.ca,Sadia.Groguhe@parl.gc.ca,
Dan.Harris@parl.gc.ca,jack.harris@parl.gc.ca,Sana.Hassainia@parl.gc.ca,carol.hughes@parl.gc.ca,bruce.hyer@parl.gc.ca,
Pierre.Jacob@parl.gc.ca,peter.julian@parl.gc.ca,Matthew.Kellway@parl.gc.ca,Francois.Lapointe@parl.gc.ca,Jean-Francois.Larose@parl.gc.ca,
Alexandrine.Latendresse@parl.gc.ca,Helene.Laverdiere@parl.gc.ca,Helene.LeBlanc@parl.gc.ca,
megan.leslie@parl.gc.ca,Laurin.Liu@parl.gc.ca,Hoang.Mai@parl.gc.ca,wayne.marston@parl.gc.ca,pat.martin@parl.gc.ca,
brian.masse@parl.gc.ca,irene.mathyssen@parl.gc.ca,Elaine.Michaud@parl.gc.ca,Christine.Moore@parl.gc.ca,
Dany.Morin@parl.gc.ca,Isabelle.Morin@parl.gc.ca,Marc-Andre.Morin@parl.gc.ca,Marie-Claude.Morin@parl.gc.ca,thomas.mulcair@parl.gc.ca,Pierre.Nantel@parl.gc.ca,Peggy.Nash@parl.gc.ca,Jamie.Nicholls@parl.gc.ca,
Jose.Nunez-Melo@parl.gc.ca,Annick.Papillon@parl.gc.ca,Claude.Patry@parl.gc.ca,Eve.Peclet@parl.gc.ca,Manon.Perreault@parl.gc.ca,
Francois.Pilon@parl.gc.ca,
john.rafferty@parl.gc.ca,Mathieu.Ravignat@parl.gc.ca,Francine.Raynault@parl.gc.ca,
Jean.Rousseau@parl.gc.ca,Romeo.Saganash@parl.gc.ca,Jasbir.Sandhu@parl.gc.ca,denise.savoie@parl.gc.ca,
Djaouida.Sellah@parl.gc.ca,devinder.shory@parl.gc.ca,Jinny.Sims@parl.gc.ca,Rathika.Sitsabaiesan@parl.gc.ca,Lise.St-Denis@parl.gc.ca,Kennedy.Stewart@parl.gc.ca,peter.stoffer@parl.gc.ca,Mike.Sullivan@parl.gc.ca,glenn.thibeault@parl.gc.ca,
Philip.Toone@parl.gc.ca,Jonathan.Tremblay@parl.gc.ca


Conservative:

diane.ablonczy@parl.gc.ca,Eve.Adams@parl.gc.ca,Mark.Adler@parl.gc.ca,
leona.aglukkaq@parl.gc.ca,Dan.Albas@parl.gc.ca,harold.albrecht@parl.gc.ca,
Chris.Alexander@parl.gc.ca,  mike.allen@parl.gc.ca,dean.allison@parl.gc.ca,  Stella.Ambler@parl.gc.ca,rona.ambrose@parl.gc.ca,rob.anders@parl.gc.ca,  david.anderson@parl.gc.ca,scott.armstrong@parl.gc.ca,keith.ashfield@parl.gc.ca,   Jay.Aspin@parl.gc.ca,John.baird@parl.gc.ca,Joyce.Bateman@parl.gc.ca,leon.benoit@parl.gc.ca,maxime.bernier@parl.gc.ca,
james.bezan@parl.gc.ca,steven.blaney@parl.gc.ca,kelly.block@parl.gc.ca,ray.boughen@parl.gc.ca,
peter.braid@parl.gc.ca,garry.breitkreuz@parl.gc.ca,gord.brown@parl.gc.ca,lois.brown@parl.gc.ca,
patrick.brown@parl.gc.ca,
rod.bruinooge@parl.gc.ca,Brad.Butt@parl.gc.ca,paul.calandra@parl.gc.ca,blaine.calkins@parl.gc.ca,
ron.cannan@parl.gc.ca,John.Carmichael@parl.gc.ca,colin.carrie@parl.gc.ca,Corneliu.Chisu@parl.gc.ca,michael.chong@parl.gc.ca,
rob.clarke@parl.gc.ca,tony.clement@parl.gc.ca,Joe.Daniel@parl.gc.ca,pat.davidson@parl.gc.ca,
dean.delmastro@parl.gc.ca,dean.delmastro@parl.gc.ca,barry.devolin@parl.gc.ca,earl.dreeshen@parl.gc.ca,
john.duncan@parl.gc.ca,rick.dykstra@parl.gc.ca,julian.fantino@parl.gc.ca,ed.fast@parl.gc.ca,Kerry-Lynne.Findlay@parl.gc.ca,diane.finley@parl.gc.ca,jim.flaherty@parl.gc.ca,steven.fletcher@parl.gc.ca,royal.galipeau@parl.gc.ca,cheryl.gallant@parl.gc.ca,
shelly.glover@parl.gc.ca,Robert.Goguen@parl.gc.ca,peter.goldring@parl.gc.ca,gary.goodyear@parl.gc.ca,Bal.Gosal@parl.gc.ca,jacques.gourde@parl.gc.ca,
nina.grewal@parl.gc.ca,stephen.harper@parl.gc.ca,richard.harris@parl.gc.ca,laurie.hawn@parl.gc.ca,Bryan.Hayes@parl.gc.ca,russ.hiebert@parl.gc.ca,
Jim.Hillyer@parl.gc.ca,randy.hoback@parl.gc.ca,candice.hoeppner@parl.gc.ca,
ed.holder@parl.gc.ca,Roxanne.James@parl.gc.ca,brian.jean@parl.gc.ca,
randy.kamp@parl.gc.ca,gerald.keddy@parl.gc.ca,jason.kenney@parl.gc.ca,peter.kent@parl.gc.ca,greg.kerr@parl.gc.ca,ed.komarnicki@parl.gc.ca,
daryl.kramp@parl.gc.ca,mike.lake@parl.gc.ca,denis.lebel@parl.gc.ca,
Ryan.Leef@parl.gc.ca,Kellie.Leitch@parl.gc.ca,pierre.lemieux@parl.gc.ca,Chungsen.Leung@parl.gc.ca,Wladyslaw.Lizon@parl.gc.ca,ben.lobb@parl.gc.ca,tom.lukiwski@parl.gc.ca,james.lunney@parl.gc.ca,peter.mackay@parl.gc.ca,dave.mackenzie@parl.gc.ca,colin.mayes@parl.gc.ca,
phil.mccoleman@parl.gc.ca,cathy.mcleod@parl.gc.ca,Costas.Menegakis@parl.gc.ca,
ted.menzies@parl.gc.ca,larry.miller@parl.gc.ca,james.moore@parl.gc.ca,rob.moore@parl.gc.ca,
rob.nicholson@parl.gc.ca,deepak.obhrai@parl.gc.ca,
gordon.oconnor@parl.gc.ca,
bev.oda@parl.gc.ca,Joe.Oliver@parl.gc.ca,tilly.oneillgordon@parl.gc.ca,Ted.Opitz@parl.gc.ca,
christian.paradis@parl.gc.ca,lavar.payne@parl.gc.ca,Peter.Penashue@parl.gc.ca,
pierre.poilievre@parl.gc.ca,joe.preston@parl.gc.ca,lisa.raitt@parl.gc.ca,brent.rathgeber@parl.gc.ca,
scott.reid@parl.gc.ca,Michelle.Rempel@parl.gc.ca,blake.richards@parl.gc.ca,
lee.richardson@parl.gc.ca,greg.rickford@parl.gc.ca,gerry.ritz@parl.gc.ca,andrew.saxton@parl.gc.ca,
andrew.scheer@parl.gc.ca,gary.schellenberger@parl.gc.ca,Kyle.Seeback@parl.gc.ca,
gail.shea@parl.gc.ca,bev.shipley@parl.gc.ca,joy.smith@parl.gc.ca,robert.sopuck@parl.gc.ca,
kevin.sorenson@parl.gc.ca,bruce.stanton@parl.gc.ca,brian.storseth@parl.gc.ca,
Mark.Strahl@parl.gc.ca,
david.sweet@parl.gc.ca,david.tilson@parl.gc.ca,Lawrence.Toet@parl.gc.ca,vic.toews@parl.gc.ca,
brad.trost@parl.gc.ca,Bernard.Trottier@parl.gc.ca,Susan.Truppe@parl.gc.ca,
merv.tweed@parl.gc.ca,tim.uppal@parl.gc.ca,Bernard.Valcourt@parl.gc.ca,Frank.valeriote@parl.gc.ca,dave.vankesteren@parl.gc.ca,
peter.vanloan@parl.gc.ca,maurice.vellacott@parl.gc.ca,mike.wallace@parl.gc.ca,
mark.warawa@parl.gc.ca,chris.warkentin@parl.gc.ca,jeff.watson@parl.gc.ca,
john.weston@parl.gc.ca,john.weston@parl.gc.ca,rodney.weston@parl.gc.ca,
David.Wilks@parl.gc.ca,John.Williamson@parl.gc.ca,alice.wong@parl.gc.ca,
stephen.woodworth@parl.gc.ca,lynne.yelich@parl.gc.ca,terence.young@parl.gc.ca,
Bob.Zimmer@parl.gc.ca

Liberal:

mauril.belanger@parl.gc.ca,carolyn.bennett@parl.gc.ca,scott.brison@parl.gc.ca,gerry.byrne@parl.gc.ca,
Sean.Casey@parl.gc.ca,denis.coderre@parl.gc.ca,irwin.cotler@parl.gc.ca,rodger.cuzner@parl.gc.ca,
bob.dechert@parl.gc.ca,stephane.dion@parl.gc.ca,kirsty.duncan@parl.gc.ca,wayne.easter@parl.gc.ca,
mark.eyking@parl.gc.ca,judy.foote@parl.gc.ca,hedy.fry@parl.gc.ca,marc.garneau@parl.gc.ca,
ralph.goodale@parl.gc.ca,Ted.Hsu@parl.gc.ca,jim.karygiannis@parl.gc.ca,kevin.lamoureux@parl.gc.ca,
guy.lauzon@parl.gc.ca,lawrence.macaulay@parl.gc.ca,john.mccallum@parl.gc.ca,david.mcguinty@parl.gc.ca,
john.mckay@parl.gc.ca,joyce.murray@parl.gc.ca,rick.norlock@parl.gc.ca,massimo.pacetti@parl.gc.ca,
bob.rae@parl.gc.ca,james.rajotte@parl.gc.ca,geoff.regan@parl.gc.ca,judy.sgro@parl.gc.ca,scott.simms@parl.gc.ca,
justin.trudeau@parl.gc.ca,Frank.valeriote@parl.gc.ca, 

Bloc:
andre.bellavance@parl.gc.ca,Jean-Francois.Fortin@parl.gc.ca,maria.mourani@parl.gc.ca

Green:


Elizabeth.May@parl.gc.ca 

JFK Speaks

Here's a neat little clip of a JFK speech.

As usual, I intend to make no assertions or allegations of the truth or falsehood of anything said by Mr. Kennedy. I intend only to make this information available, and to note that it exists.

I am not, after all, a "conspiracy theorist". Conspiracies don't exist. Period. Never have. Everything happens in the sun. Always has. To think otherwise would be "crazy".




This new informational paradigm is fascinating.

Search Engine Optimized UFO News Aggregation Blog Entry Title

WARNING: YOU ARE ENTERING A ZONE WHERE BULLSHIT IS ACTUALLY ENCOURAGED.

I've decided to continue blogging conspiracy theory stuff. Why not? It's fun.

I've spent the last few weeks researching some of the most far-out assertions and claims I could find, and what I've discovered in doing so is a rich tapestry of material that is either a) disturbing evidence that the universe is way more fucked up than you think or b) a testament to the fertility, depth, and profound weirdness of the human mind.

So, today, let's see what people are saying about UFOS and ETs on Youtube. I've aggregated some links for you to check out.

Here's Buzz Aldrin saying that a UFO followed Apollo 11 to the moon.

Here's Buzz Aldrin saying there's a monolith on Mars.

Here's Dr. Edgar Mitchell saying the government has documents to prove that we're not alone.

Here's Mitchell at home going into a bit more detail in asserting a cover-up of alien contact going back to the Area 51 incident.

While some assert that Mitchell is a loon who has lost it, I would just like to state for the record at this point that I have neither a doctorate degree, nor photos of myself walking in space on my wall, so I am willing to accept his testimony as credible. He seems to be pretty lucid in both of those videos.

Here's Gordon Cooper talking about his encounters with 'a vast armada' of UFOs while on duty as an air force pilot.

Here's Neil Armstrong, a recluse who at one point was the most famous man on the planet, sobbing as he confesses to children that they will have to remove truth's protective layers in the process of discovering new things. Weird, right?

Here's a former Canadian Minister of Defense Paul Hellyer eloquently telling a crowd that the government is covering up evidence of UFOs and ET contact.

Here's the Mexican military going public with video footage of UFOs.

Here are 14 men from high levels of government and the military asking for more information on UFOs.

Here is Michio Kaku endorsing a book about senior military officials who have gone on record saying that they are baffled by the UFO phenomenon. The book is called UFOs: Generals, Pilots, and Government Officials On The Record. Dr, Kaku says this is as close as you are going to get to a smoking gun.

Here's the author of the book, Leslie Kean, on the Stephen Colbert show. Leslie is an investigative journalist, as difficult as it is to believe that such a thing exists in this day and age. She mentions spending ten years researching her book. Wow.

A nod to the skeptics: Here's Bill Nye the Science Guy in his capacity as a member of the Skeptic's Society getting destroyed by former air force officer Bob Jacobs on Larry King Live. Notice Bill loses his shit early on and bases his approach to the material on a straw man argument (he attempts to argue against an assertion none of them have made). Reasoning skills 101 nono. His points are otherwise not bad, but he also insults the intelligence and skirts very close to impugning the honesty of the people in the room with him. A good lesson in how not to go about being a skeptic.